This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
blog:2012-03-23:ipv6_the_future_is_now [2013-08-05 Mon 23:56] jrwz |
blog:2012-03-23:ipv6_the_future_is_now [2013-08-05 Mon 23:57] (current) jrwz |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | === IPv6: The future is now! === | + | ==== IPv6: The future is now! ==== |
I've been intrigued and learning about IPv6 for somewhat over a year now, and I started implementing and using it on my home LAN for some six months ago When I first started to implement it, I discovered that the Linksys WRT610n wireless router I was using as the network's main router has a half-assed implementation of a IPv6 tunnel. Normally I wouldn't print anything approaching such profanity on my web site, but it is the perfect description of what Linksys (Cisco) did: They made the router firmware so that a 6to4 tunnel is enabled, but they didn't document it, nor did they give the user the option of disabling it as part of the normal web interface. In my opinion, that merits the "half-assed" moniker. | I've been intrigued and learning about IPv6 for somewhat over a year now, and I started implementing and using it on my home LAN for some six months ago When I first started to implement it, I discovered that the Linksys WRT610n wireless router I was using as the network's main router has a half-assed implementation of a IPv6 tunnel. Normally I wouldn't print anything approaching such profanity on my web site, but it is the perfect description of what Linksys (Cisco) did: They made the router firmware so that a 6to4 tunnel is enabled, but they didn't document it, nor did they give the user the option of disabling it as part of the normal web interface. In my opinion, that merits the "half-assed" moniker. |